A Smith Dilemma!

I can't be the only person who comes across the SMITH name and wonders what on earth to do for the best!

Emily Bessie SMITH from elainemaul@hotmail.com
Emily Bessie SMITH
My grandmother's name was Emily Bessie SMITH, born 9 Mar 1904 in Enfield, Middlesex (now London) to William SMITH (a Carman to a Horse Dealer) and Emily Jane JAMES. William and Emily married on 11 Dec 1893 in Enfield, Middlesex in Jesus Church. William says he is a 25 year old Carman, with father of John SMITH (Deep joy!). Emily was only 18 when she married, giving her father as Edward JAMES, and on the 1891 census, she's shown as 15 living with her parents, Edward and Ann, in Enfield. Her occupation is given as Scholar which is surprising as they weren't well off - her father was a Cowkeeper! 
Anyhow, I give that extra detail because (assumption alert!) .... it doesn't look like she went very far? As a 15 year old, for instance, she wasn't living somewhere else in service.
As a couple living in Enfield, on the 1901 census, William SMITH is 31, a Labourer, and gives his birth place as Islington and on the 1911 census (still in Enfield), he's 40, a Process Man in a Lead Works, and still gives his birth place as Islington.
So far, so good!
Back many moons ago, long before doing the FutureLearn course, I'd done a search through the 1891 census in Enfield and found William SMITH, aged 22 and a Carman, living with John and Julia SMITH and giving the birth place of Islington. Eureka, I thought, that must be him! However, now I'm not so sure. 
From a Genealogical Proof Standard, can I be sure I have the right person?
The slightly varying ages on the documents I have indicate a birth date that could be between 1867 and 1871. I've done a search through the 1891 census, picking up William SMITHs with a birth of Islington and even just London. There are some that are on their own ie lodgers with no father named that are labourers or Carmen but they are a fair way into London. They are 'possibles' but what is the likelihood that Emily would have met one of them rather than the William just down the road? 
In 1891, Emily was living in Green Street, Enfield with William living on Main Avenue, Bush Hill Park, Enfield.
What do other people think?
If you've read that far ....... thank you :)

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Mary PRICE - Getting closer?

I swear to you that I really have tried to find Mary PRICE on the 1871 census before! Or maybe I just dreamed I did? After all, I may well have just seen the PRICE name and headed for a dark place to lie down :) Still, I have today found the PRICE family on the 1871 census, living at 48 Hatton Wall, Saffron Hill, Finsbury, London. On Ancestry, the Civil Parish is described as "Ely Rents and Hatton Garden and Saffron Hill" which may be appropriate as number 48 Hatton Wall has a number of families living in it as well as the PRICE family. Perhaps it is some kind of rental apartment? The entry for number 48 starts on the previous page of the census. There's the GUIDETTI family, consisting of Pietro and Margaret GUIDETTI and their five children, the STABLES family, headed by the widow Mary A STABLES with six members of her family, five children and one daughter-in-law and also the AMBLER family headed by the widower William AMBLER with his three sons. The PRICE family ...
Read more

Future Learn Course

Having just completed the free online course called Genealogy: Researching Your Family Tree with FutureLearn, I thought a blog to record my Family Tree Researches might be a good idea. This free course was run by the University of Strathclyde and I would very much recommend it. They have already run it a few times and will no doubt do so again. You can always register your interest to find out when it's being run again. Although the course covers beginner topics, it's not just for beginners. I have been researching both my own and my husband's trees for some considerable time but I still found lots of topics of interest and new links to resources I didn't know about. One of the topics was looking at how to write a family history to publish and this also included writing a blog. There are so many genealogy blogs 'out there' that I doubted very much that anyone would want to read my whitterings. However, as one of my major failings is jumping around, search...
Read more

Baby William DIXON born 1890

Poor little baby William DIXON. He was born in 1890 but doesn't appear on the 1891 census. I did search for a death entry but the only one I could find at all was for a 2 year old William DIXON whose death was registered in the Holborn district in the 3Q 1890. However, I'm sure this is 'my' William DIXON and I wondered whether the age of death on the index entry was wrong and this 2 years is really 2 months and so it should say zero? I submitted an error report to the GRO website on the 17th August to see if it could be checked and it has been checked and updated by them! I checked today! I do think it is worth submitting error reports to help other researchers. So far, I've submitted 3 since the beginning of July this year and so far two have resulted in them updating various things on the indexes. Anyhow, back to little William! So, I've found the death entry for him. He died aged only 2 months and his death registration details are as follows: Willi...
Read more